Opinion
The opinion
Per Curiam.
For the reasons stated in Licata v. Lutz, 48 N. J. 255 (1966), decided today, the judgment is affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Schettino and Haneman — 6.
For reversal — None.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.