Opinion

Thomas v. Board of Education

  • 46 N.J. 581
  • 218 A.2d 630
  • 1966 N.J. LEXIS 284
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Apr 4, 1966
Status
Published
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 80.4%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. 89 N. J. Super. 327 (App. Div. 1965). We reserve, however, the question whether mere execution of the three-year contract of employment entered into on August 18, 1961 between Thomas and the Board of Education, even if it had been a valid one, would have given tenure to Thomas.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino — 6.

For reversal — None.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.