Opinion

Board of Pharmacy v. Faunce

  • 6 N.J. Misc. 385
  • 141 A. 923
  • 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 302
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Apr 19, 1928
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

These cases have been argued together. Both defendants were charged with the violation of section 2 of an act entitled “An act to regulate the practice of pharmacy in this state.” 3 Gomp. Stat., p. 3944.

The defendants were both convicted in the small cause court, but on appeal to the Common Pleas, that court granted a nonsuit.

We consider that the legal propriety of that action is fairly debatable, and a writ of certiorari is granted in each case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.