Opinion

United States v. Joseph Nathaniel Brown, Jr., A/K/A Joe Jr.

  • 94 F.3d 642
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36737
  • 1996 WL 469854
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 20, 1996
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

94 F.3d 642

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Joseph Nathaniel BROWN, Jr., a/k/a Joe Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6258.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1996.

Joseph Nathaniel Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to compel the prosecutor in his criminal case to produce certain documents. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-93-151 (E.D.Va. Jan. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.