Opinion

Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

  • 64 F. App'x 62
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Apr 24, 2003
Status
Published
On the bench
Browning, McKeown, Rawlinson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.8%

The opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant Leonard S. Brown (“Brown”) contends that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Insurance Company (collectively “State Farm”) breached both the insurance contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by delaying the payment of underinsured motorist insurance benefits.

Because Brown recovered all the benefits due to him under his policy, State Farm did not breach its contract with Brown for insurance coverage. See Quinterno v. Mercury Cas. Co., 11 Cal.4th 1049, 1056 , 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 , 906 P.2d 1057 (1995).

State Farm did not breach the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Unresolved liability issues concerning State Farm’s other insured driver made it reasonable for State Farm to proceed to trial for a determination of its exposure. Questions of coverage negate a bad faith claim as a matter of law. See Guebara v. Allstate Ins. Co., 237 F.3d 987, 992 (9th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.