Opinion

Brown v. Edmonds

63 F. App'x 774

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed: May 29, 2003
Status: Published
On the bench: Hamilton, King, Luttig
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Demarcus M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea *775 soning of the district court. See Brown v. Edmonds, No. CA-03-132-7 (W.D.Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003 & entered Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.