Opinion

United States v. Brown

  • 36 F. App'x 519
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 11, 2002
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Mark Wayne Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his request for pre-trial, trial, and sentencing transcripts. Brown claims he should receive free access to the transcripts because he plans to raise claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel in a habeas proceeding filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We find that Brown has not demonstrated an adequate need for the transcripts by merely providing the type of claims he plans to present in his habeas motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 753 (f) (1994). Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.