The opinion
PER CURIAM.
William Arthur Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions to amend and to reconsider the denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-92-270-MU; CA-00-197-3-1-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Oct. 31, 2001; entered Nov. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *103 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.