Opinion

Charles E. Brown v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

  • 62 F.3d 1414
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29208
  • 1995 WL 471103
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 10, 1995
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

62 F.3d 1414

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles E. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney

General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 94-7361.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 10, 1995.

Submitted: July 25, 1995

Decided: August 10, 1995

Charles E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. CA-93-2558-3-OBD (D.S.C. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.