Opinion

James Martin Brown v. Edward W. Murray

  • 60 F.3d 820
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24746
  • 1995 WL 404845
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jul 10, 1995
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

60 F.3d 820

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Martin BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-7138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.

Decided July 10, 1995.

James Martin Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Brown v. Murray, No. CA-94-391 (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.