Opinion

Troy Watson v. Shell Oil Company, and Brown & Root, U.S.A., Inc., Robert Adams, Sr. v. Shell Oil Company, and Brown & Root, U.S.A., Inc.

  • 53 F.3d 663
  • 1994 WL 778842
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jan 25, 1994
Status
Published
On the bench
Politz, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Demoss
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 83.6%

finding common questions arising from an oil refinery explosion that injured more than 18,000 plaintiffs

How later courts described this case

  • finding common questions arising from an oil refinery explosion that injured more than 18,000 plaintiffs
  • certifying class claims for punitive damages

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*664

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 7, 1992, 5 Cir., 1992, 979 F.2d 1014 )

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

*

Prior Report: 136 F.R.D. 588 .

BY THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of appéllants. Shell Oil Company and Brown & Root, U.S.A., Inc. and appellees, the plaintiffs’ Legal Committee, to dismiss these interlocutory appeals presently pending for rehearing en banc, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs, is granted.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.