Opinion

Pirozzi v. City of New York

  • 117 F.3d 722
  • 1997 WL 424454
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Filed
Jul 30, 1997
Status
Published
On the bench
Jacobs, Leval, Winter
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Pirozzi and Frank Rotundi appeal from Judge Scheindlin’s adverse grant of summary judgment in their action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The appellants, New York City Police Officers, allege that the release of their testimony before the New York City Police Department Civilian Complaint Review Board to the Kings County District Attorney violated both their Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination and their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pirozzi v. City of New York, 950 F.Supp. 90 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.