Opinion

Maney v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

210 Or. App. 351
150 P.3d 50
2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1995

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed: Dec 27, 2006
Status: Published
On the bench: Landau, Ortega, Schuman
Cited by: 0 cases
Authority: More cited than 17.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of aggravated murder in 1981 and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for a minimum of 20 years. In 2002, petitioner asked for a parole release date. The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision conducted an aggravated murder review hearing. Following that hearing, the board declined to set a release date, finding that petitioner was unlikely to be rehabilitated within a reasonable period of time. Petitioner now seeks judicial review, arguing that the board erred in failing to conduct the hearing in accordance with the contested case procedures required by ORS 163.105(3). The state concedes that, under Larsen v. Board of Parole, 206 Or App 353, 365 , 138 P3d 16 (2006), petitioner is correct. We agree.

Reversed and remanded.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.