Opinion

State v. Hynes

  • 27 Or. App. 37
  • 554 P.2d 1030
  • 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1298
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Oct 4, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Sloan
On the bench
Schwab, Sloan, Tanzer
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 46.8%

The opinion

SLOAN, S. J.

The court below, in this mental commitment hearing, took judicial notice of the record of a prior commitment proceeding concerning David Hynes. State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59 , 545 P2d 97 (1976), held that judicial notice of prior court files was improper. The state, however, argues that O’Neill is inapplicable where the judicial notice is taken in the dispositional "phase” of a commitment hearing rather than in the adjudicative phase of the hearing. We must disagree. Whether or not ORS ch 426 now provides for a separate dispositional "phase” of the commitment process, we read State v. O’ Neill, supra, as precluding taking judicial notice of prior court files in any event.

Reversed and remanded.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.