The opinion
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The decision of the National Labor Relations Board in this case is supported by substantial evidence; but in our judgment Paragraph 1 (b) of its order is too broad to conform to the limitations expressed and applied in May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 66 S.Ct. 203 . Compare National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426 , 61 S.Ct. 693 , 85 L.Ed. 930 .
Accordingly, Paragraph 1(b) of the order of the Board will be amended by dedetiug the following words at the end of the paragraph: “to bargain collectively through representatives of cheir own choosing, and to engage m concerted activities, for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection as guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act [ 29 U.S.C.A. § 157 ].” A period will be substituted for the comma immediately preceding the deleted wordst of the paragraph. See National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Engineering Company, Inc., et al., 6 Cir., 153 F.2d 233 .
With the specified modification, the order of the National Labor Relations Board is directed to be enforced.