Opinion

Detroit Trust Co. v. Commissioner

  • 16 B.T.A. 207
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Apr 25, 1929
Status
Published
Author
Lansdon
On the bench
Lansdon
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

*212 OPINION.-

Lansdon:

The single issue presented in these proceedings is whether the beneficiaries of a trust are entitled to deductions for depletion on account of the removal of ore from mining properties constituting the corpus of the trust.

The principle involved has been carefully considered and disposed of in a number of decisions by the Board and the courts, which we consider controlling in the instant proceedings. Arthw H. Fleming, 6 B. T. A. 900, and cases cited therein; Kate Fowler Merle-Smith, 11 B. T. A. 254; Margaret B. Fowler, 11 B. T. A. 265; George Snyder Crilly, 15 B. T. A. 642; Samuel Richer, Jr., 15 B. T. A. 1160; Baltzell v. Mitchell (C. C. A.), 3 Fed. (2d) 428; certiorari denied, 268 U. S. 690 ; Whitcomb v. Blair, 25 Fed. (2d) 528; affirming Margaret T. Whitcomb, 5 B. T. A. 191; Abell v. Twit (C. C. A.), 30 Fed. (2d) 54; Mary Roxburghe v. United States, 64 Ct. Cls. 223. It follows that the determination of the respondent is approved.

Reviewed by the Board.

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.