Opinion

State v. Freeman

  • 130 Ohio St. 3d 205
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 12, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 54.6%

The opinion

{¶ 1} Proposition of Law No. I is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. On consideration of Proposition of Law No. IV, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1 , 2010-Ohio-6320 , 941 N.E.2d 768 . On consideration of Proposition of Law No. VI, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Dunlap, 129 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2011-Ohio-4111 , 953 N.E.2d 816 .

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Katherine Mullin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sheryl Prichard, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.