Opinion

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.

  • 127 Ohio St. 3d 122
  • 936 N.E.2d 960
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 2, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Accept, Appeal, Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton, Would
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.8%

The opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413 , 2010-Ohio-3237 , 934 N.E.2d 913 , and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with Pettiford v. Aggarwal.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.