Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

84 Ohio St. 3d 1
701 N.E.2d 681

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Nov 10, 1998
Status: Published
On the bench: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Stayed, Stratton, Sweeney, Years
Cited by: 3 cases
Authority: More cited than 77.1%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusions that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules as charged. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended- from the practice of law. A condition of respondent’s possible reinstatement will be evidence of compliance with his contract with OLAP. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would suspend respondent for two years with one year stayed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.