Opinion

State ex rel. Kynard v. Court of Common Pleas

62 Ohio St. 2d 308
16 Ohio Op. 3d 356
405 N.E.2d 719
1980 Ohio LEXIS 746

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 11, 1980
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by: 3 cases
Authority: More cited than 56.9%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

A writ of prohibition will issue when a court seeks to exercise judicial power not authorized by law. State, ex rel. Adler, v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 1 ; State, ex rel. Wall, v. Grossman (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 4 .

Here, there is no question that the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County is authorized to hear a case charging aggravated murder. Appellant’s contentions are to the sufficiency of the indictment and not to the jurisdiction of the trial court to hear and determine the cause. Alleged irregularities in the proceedings of the grand jury returning an indictment do not deprive the lower court of jurisdiction to proceed thereunder. Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal. Chapman v. Jago (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 51 ; Silliman v. Court (1933), 126 Ohio St. 338 .

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the complaint for a writ of prohibition is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.