Opinion

State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Industrial Commission

  • 58 Ohio St. 2d 458
  • 12 Ohio Op. 3d 383
  • 391 N.E.2d 315
  • 1979 Ohio LEXIS 458
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 27, 1979
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 47.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Eelators have failed to allege facts givr ing rise to a clear legal duty entitling them to the writ of mandamus. Furthermore, relators do not allege that the commission lacks jurisdiction to act, but only that such action would be erroneous. If a tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the question before it, a writ of prohibition will not issue to prevent it from exercising that authority. State, ex rel. McCaffrey, v. Cleveland (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 346, 347 .

Accordingly, the writs of mandamus and prohibition are denied.- .

Writs denied.

CeLEBREZZE, . C. ■ J., HERBERT, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.