Opinion

State v. Westfall

  • 46 Ohio St. 2d 31
  • 75 Ohio Op. 2d 97
  • 346 N.E.2d 282
  • 1976 Ohio LEXIS 589
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 21, 1976
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 68.7%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds the case of State v. Williamson (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 195 , controlling.

*32 In Williamson , at page 196, this court held:

“In our opinion, a defendant incarcerated in prison and acting without the aid of counsel filed his notice of appeal in time, if, within the * * * period specified * * * he delivers such notice to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court. In such a case, the jailer in effect represents the lower court * * *. We believe that such a conclusion is required by Fallen v. United States (1964), 378 U. S. 139 .”

In the case at bar, appellant filed his original notice of appeal with the Legal Officer of the Chillicothe Correctional Institute on July 18, 1975, well within the time for perfecting his appeal. Through no fáult of appellant, the notice of appeal was erroneously mailed to Lucas County. Therefore, appellant, who properly followed institution procedure, has filed his notice of appeal “in time” by delivering such notice “to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court.” Williamson, supra.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

Judgment reversed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.