Opinion

State ex rel. Crebs v. Court of Common Pleas

  • 38 Ohio St. 2d 51
  • 67 Ohio Op. 2d 61
  • 309 N.E.2d 926
  • 1974 Ohio LEXIS 420
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 17, 1974
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Browíf, Celebrezze, Corrxgan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
Cited by
19 cases
Authority
More cited than 98.1%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Appellant seeks to have the constitutionality of the statutes, under which the action against him was brought, determined in this prohibition action. However, the unconstitutionality of a statute does not deprive a court of the initial jurisdiction to proceed according to its terms. Appellant has other remedies in the ordinary course of the law and by way of appeal. Furthermore, prohibition cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Rhodes, v. Solether (1955), 162 Ohio St. 559 . See State, ex rel. Ellis, v. McCabe (1941), 138 Ohio St. 417 .

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, 0. J., Herbert, CorrxgaN, SterN, Celebrezze, W. Browíf and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.