Opinion

Evans v. Whirlpool Corp.

  • 10 Ohio St. 2d 240
  • 39 Ohio Op. 2d 372
  • 227 N.E.2d 208
  • 1967 Ohio LEXIS 400
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 31, 1967
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 91.2%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

When the city accepted these waste materials from defendant with actual notice of their character, it undertook to dispose of them and thus became, as to the defendant, an independent contractor.

This court’s holding in Wellman v. East Ohio Gas Co., 160 Ohio St. 103 , disposes of plaintiff’s contentions. Paragraphs one and two of the syllabus read:

“1. Where an independent contractor undertakes to do work for another in the very doing of which there are elements of real or potential danger and one of such contractor’s employees is injured as an incident to the performance of the work, no liability for such injury ordinarily attaches to the one who engaged the services of the independent contractor.

‘ ‘ 2. One who engages an independent contractor to do work for him ordinarily owes no duty of protection to the employees of such contractor, in connection with the execution of the work, who proceeds therewith knowing and appreciating that there is a condition of danger surrounding its performance.”

The trial court was correct in directing the verdict for the defendant. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.