Opinion

Moore v. Siebelt

  • 6 Ohio St. 2d 115
  • 35 Ohio Op. 2d 135
  • 216 N.E.2d 62
  • 1966 Ohio LEXIS 350
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 20, 1966
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 62.7%

holding tire failure cannot serve as a legal excuse for failing to comply with assured-clear-distance-ahead statute

How later courts described this case

  • holding tire failure cannot serve as a legal excuse for failing to comply with assured-clear-distance-ahead statute
  • dealing with an accident caused by an unanticipated tire blow-out

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant failed to comply with the assured-clear-distanee-ahead provision of Section 4511.21, Revised Code. An emergency caused by tire failure cannot serve as a legal excuse for such noncomplianee. The trial court was in error in charging the jury on sudden emergency. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Stump v. Phillians, 2 Ohio St. 2d 209 ; Bird v. Hart, 2 Ohio St. 2d 9 ; Spalding v. Waxler, 2 Ohio St. 2d 1 . See Kehrer v. McKittrick, 176 Ohio St. 192 .

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Matthias, O ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.