Opinion

State ex rel. Vitoratos v. Whiddon

3 Ohio St. 2d 52
32 Ohio Op. 2d 28
209 N.E.2d 171
1965 Ohio LEXIS 444

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 30, 1965
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by: 2 cases
Authority: More cited than 81.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

If, as relator contends, respondent has property belonging to relator, relator may recover such property in an action of replevin. In the exercise of its discretion, this court will ordinarily refuse a writ of mandamus where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., v. Industrial Com mission, 162 Ohio St. 302 .

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.