Opinion

Brown v. Friends

  • 25 F.3d 1038
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20781
  • 1994 WL 197010
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
May 18, 1994
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

25 F.3d 1038

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie X BROWN; James X Ervin; Winfred X Fletcher; Calvin

E. X Gay; James 3X Prince; Jerome X Richardson;

Johnathan Lee X, Plaintiffs Appellants,

and

David X Batts; Andrew Belfield; George X Chapman; David X

Chestnut; Michael X Dorsey; Bruce X Driver; Joe X.

Harrison; Gregory Lamar X Smith; James 4X Brown; Plummer

X Davis; John A. X Mickens, Plaintiffs,

v.

Dorothy FRIENDS, Chief Dietician; David Garraghty, Warden;

Leon Williams, Food Service Manager; James

Wheeler; David Williams, Defendants Appellees.

No. 92-6874.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 4, 1994.

Decided: May 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-92-54-R, CA-92-167-R)

Willie X Brown, James X Ervin, Winfred X. Fletcher, Calvin E. X Gay, James 3X Prince, Jerome X Richardson, Johnathan Lee X, Appellants Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Reneen Evat Hewlett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Batts, Nos. CA-92-54-R, CA-92-167-R (E.D. Va. July 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.