residents, qualified voters, and taxpayers have standing in quo war-ranto
How later courts described this case
- residents, qualified voters, and taxpayers have standing in quo war-ranto
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Devin, J.
The judgment of nonsuit was improvidently entered. It was made to appear from the admissions in the answer and the evidence offered by the relators that 1 July, 1949, the defendant was elected by the Board of Commissioners of Granite Falls as chief of police of that town, which office he is now holding, and that defendant is not a qualified voter therein. It was also admitted that relators are residents, qualified voters, and taxpayers of Granite Falls.
The office of chief of police of an incorporated town, as Granite Falls is admitted to be, is a public office. Foard v. Hall, 111 N.C. 369 , 16 S.E. 420 . The relators had a right to institute this action for the cause set out in the complaint. Bouldin v. Davis, 197 N.C. 731 , 150 S.E. 507 ; Midgett v. Gray, 158 N.C. 133 , 73 S.E. 791 . The statute (G.S. 160-25) provides that “No person shall be mayor, commissioner, intendant of police, alderman or other chief officer of any city or town unless he shall be a qualified voter therein.” This statute, said Chief Justice Clark in Foard v. Hall, supra, “embraces the office of chief of police.”
The judgment of nonsuit must be vacated.
Reversed.