Opinion

Harney v. Mayor

  • 229 N.C. 71
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
May 5, 1948
Status
Published
Author
Denny
On the bench
Denny
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.6%

The opinion

Denny, J.

It does not appear on this record that the purported case on appeal was served on the appellees, or that it was settled by agreement or otherwise.

“Exceptions which point out alleged errors occurring during the progress of a trial in which oral testimony is offered can be presented only through a ‘case on appeal’ or ‘case agreed.’ Cressler v. Asheville, supra ( 138 N. C., 482 , 51 S. E., 53 ).” Russos v. Bailey, 228 N. C., 783 , 47 S. E. (2d), 22 .

Hence, the exception to the judgment presents the only question for consideration on the appeal. The judgment is supported by the findings of fact, and must, therefore, be upheld. Wilson v. Robinson, 224 N. C., 851 , 32 S. E. (2d), 601 ; Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C., 537 , 35 S. E. (2d), 609 ; Fox v. Mills, Inc., 225 N. C., 580 , 35 S. E. (2d), 869 ; Hughes v. Oliver, 228 N. C., 680 , 47 S. E. (2d), 6 ; Roach v. Pritchett, 228 N. C., 747 , 47 S. E. (2d), 20 ; Russos v. Bailey, supra; Western N. C. Conference v. Tally, ante, 1.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.