The opinion
Opinion by
McClelland, P. J.
It appeared that the merchandise consisted of little pieces of fur which the manufacturers of garments made of fur sliced off to even up the skins. It having been established that the merchandise is not suitable or adapted to use for the purposes for which dressed fur skins are usually used, and that it consists merely of waste fit only for remanufacture into hatters’ fur, the claim as waste at 10 percent under paragraph 1555 was sustained.