Opinion

David Wayne Baughman v. National Transportation Safety Board

  • 15 F.3d 1159
  • 304 U.S. App. D.C. 428
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7578
  • 1994 WL 9935
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Jan 11, 1994
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.4%

The opinion

15 F.3d 1159

304 U.S.App.D.C. 428

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

David Wayne BAUGHMAN, Petitioner,

v.

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Respondent.

No. 92-1545.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1994.

Before: SILBERMAN, SENTELLE, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This cause came to be heard on a petition for review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board, and was briefed by counsel. While the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion, they have been accorded full consideration by the Court. See D.C.Cir.R. 35(b) (January 1, 1994). On consideration thereof, it is

2

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by this court, that the petition for review of the order of the National Transportation Safety Board is hereby denied. The petition is wholly without merit. The Board reasonably considered and rejected petitioner's argument predicated upon the flight simulation exercise in its order denying reconsideration. The ALJ did not expressly rely on the flight simulation experience, and Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 496 (1951)--on which petitioner relies exclusively--is inapposite since the Board differed with the ALJ on the standard of reasonable care for a professional pilot, not on issues of credibility. It is

3

FURTHER ORDERED, by this Court, sua sponte, that the Clerk shall withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 41(a)(1) (January 1, 1994). This instruction to the Clerk is without prejudice to the right of any party at any time to move for expedited issuance of the mandate for good cause shown.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.