withdrawing opinion, recalling judgment and mandate, and dismissing appeal, pursuant to Landicho, where veteran died prior to issuance of Court’s opinion and Court was unaware of veteran’s death at time of issuance
How later courts described this case
- withdrawing opinion, recalling judgment and mandate, and dismissing appeal, pursuant to Landicho, where veteran died prior to issuance of Court’s opinion and Court was unaware of veteran’s death at time of issuance
- relying upon Lan-dicho, supra, and recalling judgment and mandate as to decision issued after appellant had died
- Court recalls judgment and mandate as to decision issued after appellant died
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The counsel who had represented the appellant in the appeal to this Court [hereinafter referred to as “counsel”] advises that the appellant died on February 3, 1995. On July 24, 1995, this Court, unaware of the appellant’s death, vacated the September 17, 1993, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision and remanded a matter for readjudication. Keel v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 82 (1995). On November 9, 1995, counsel filed an application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d). On the same date, due to the appellant’s death, counsel, noting his unawareness of the appellant’s death at the time of this Court’s July 1995 opinion, moved to substitute Salina Rice, executrix of the appellant’s estate, as the appellant.
On November 29, 1995, citing Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994), this Court ordered counsel to show cause why the Court’s opinion in Keel, supra, should not be withdrawn and its judgment recalled under Lan-dicho, and the instant EAJA application be dismissed. On December 27, 1995, counsel filed a response which included a voluntary withdrawal of the EAJA application. On April 8, 1996, the Court recalled the judgment and mandate and withdrew the July 24, 1995, opinion.
On consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. It is further
ORDERED that counsel’s voluntary withdrawal of the EAJA application filed on December 27, 1995, is duly noted by the Court and accepted as a matter of record as of the date filed.