Opinion

Hesse v. Brown

  • 7 Vet. App. 126
  • 1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 871
  • 1994 WL 587638
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Oct 26, 1994
Status
Published
On the bench
Ivers, Kramer, Mankin
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 89.8%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On October 13, 1994, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the stay in this *127 ease be lifted and asking that judgment be entered against the appellant as the appellant concedes would be required under the decisions of the Court in Zevalkink v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 483 (1994), and Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994) (consolidated with Oseo v. Brown, No. 92-90).

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. It is further

ORDERED that judgment will be entered on the date of this order. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this order constitutes the mandate of this Court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.