Opinion

Gordon v. United States

  • 7 Ct. Cl. 1
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Dec 15, 1871
Status
Published
Author
Chase
On the bench
Chase, Field, Miller
Cited by
9 cases
Authority
More cited than 90.6%

The opinion

Chief Justice Chase

delivered the opinion of the court:

The court has fully considered the able and instructive argu *2 ments of counsel upon the question of jurisdiction, which presents itself at the threshold of this cause, and has found itself constrained to the conclusion that under the Constitution it can exercise no appellate jurisdiction over the decisions of the Court of Claims.

We think that the authority given to the head of an executive department, by necessary implication, in the fourteenth section of the amended Court of Claims act, to revise all the decisions of this court requiring payment of money, denies to it the judicial power from the exercise of which appeals can be taken to this court.

The reasons which necessitate this conclusion may be more fully announced hereafter. At present we restrict ourselves to this general statement, and to the direction that the case be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Justices Miller and Field dissented.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.