Opinion

Loveman, Jaros & Co. v. Brown & Kornman

  • 118 Ala. 664
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Nov 15, 1897
Status
Published
Author
Haralson
On the bench
Haralson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

The bill in this case was filled by the appellees as creditors of the firm of Loveman & Eger, for the purpose of setting aside a sale and conveyance of a stock of goods by Loveman & Eger to the appellants, Loveman, Jaros & Company, on the ground that such sale was had with the intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of Loveman & Eger.

On the submission of the cause, on the pleadings and proof, the chancellor decreed that the sale was fraudulent, and therefore ordered the same set aside and annulled. From this decree the appeal is taken, and the rendition thereof is assigned as error. The decree is affirmed.

Opinion by

Haralson, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.