Opinion
The opinion
Both the decisions of the board were correct for the reason (if no other) that neither of the plaintiff’s lots has the required one hundred twenty five-foot width measured along its front lot line or along the thirty-foot building front yard set-back line established by § 4-2 of the zoning by-law.
Judgments affirmed.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.