Opinion

Maria v. Board of Appeal

  • 348 Mass. 798
  • 206 N.E.2d 94
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Apr 1, 1965
Status
Published
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 71.5%

The opinion

Final decree affirmed. Notice to the city clerk of the plaintiffs’ bill in equity under G. L. e. 40A, § 21, was not given within twenty days after the decision of the board had been filed in the city clerk’s office as § 21 requires. Hence the Superior Court had no jurisdiction. Lin coln v. Board of Appeals of Framingham, 346 Mass. 418 . The plaintiffs argue that the action of the board from which they had appealed as a decision under § 21 was not a decision of the kind referred to in § 21. This argument in a circle is unavailing; the bill of complaint of course had to get over the threshold as an appeal from a decision in order to present any issue for the court’s consideration. Compare Spaulding v. Board of Appeals of Leicester, 334 Mass. 688 . We agree with the judge, however, that the recorded action of the board in this ease was an appealable decision. The motion on which all members "voted in favor" could not be understood to be anything other than a motion to grant the petition for a permit under § 17 of the zoning ordinance (see G. L. c. 40A, § 4) for a convalescent home. It incorporated a brief statement of the facts and reasons for the decision. G. L. c. 40A, § 18.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.