Opinion

Commonwealth v. Plummer

  • 147 Mass. 601
  • 18 N.E. 567
  • 1888 Mass. LEXIS 172
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Nov 26, 1888
Status
Published
Author
Morton
On the bench
Morton
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.2%

The opinion

Morton, C. J.

We need not discuss the question whether the Commonwealth would be barred from prosecuting a person for an offence by the fact that the attorney general, district attorney, or other prosecuting officer had promised such person immunity, upon calling him as a witness in the prosecution of another person for the same offence, or one connected with it. Such question is not raised in the case at bar, because there is nothing to show that the city marshal made any promise to the defendant, express or implied, that he should be protected from prosecution. Commonwealth v. Brown, 103 Mass. 422 . Commonwealth v. Denehy, 103 Mass. 424 , note.

Exceptions overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.