Opinion

Lesho v. Board of School Directors of Hanover Area School District

  • 54 Pa. Commw. 585
  • 422 A.2d 1198
  • 1980 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1833
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 19, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Craig
On the bench
Blatt, Craig, Williams
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 53.1%

The opinion

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Appellant James T. Lesho appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County which sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by the Board of School Directors of Hanover School District (board) to Lesho’s complaint in equity, which seeks an order to compel revision of school board minutes.

Because preliminary objections admit as true all matters properly pleaded, we take the facts from *587 Lesho’s complaint, which alleges that on June 14,1979 the board, consisting of 9 members including Daniel Stadulis, elected Stadulis as its treasurer at an annual salary of $6,000. Moreover, Lesho alleges that the election was recorded as eight affirmative votes, including Stadulis ’ own vote, and one vote opposed.

Lesho contends that Stadulis was by law disqualified from voting in favor of himself as treasurer of the board at an annual salary of $6,000. Consequently Lesho argues that the lower court erred by not requiring the board to amend the minutes of its June 14, 1979 meeting and expunge Stadulis’ vote.

One who has a direct personal interest in a matter under consideration by a representative public body of which he is a member is disqualified from voting on the matter, and if his vote is determinative, the action taken is void, at least where the personal interest is pecuniary in nature. Reckner v. School District of German Township, 341 Pa. 375 , 19 A.2d 402 (1941).

Stadulis’ vote to grant himself a salaried position is a nullity under Bechner, although, his one vote not being determinative, the election of him as treasurer is not invalid. However, we find no authority warranting the relief requested by Lesho. In essence he is requesting that the court order the board to rewrite the minutes to reflect a history other than that which occurred. If Lesho desires a record of the nullity of Stadulis ’ vote, this opinion fortuitously performs that function.

Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the court below.

Order

And Now, this 19th day of November, 1980, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County is hereby affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.