Opinion

Bifalco v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

  • 583 Pa. 37
  • 874 A.2d 1145
  • 2005 Pa. LEXIS 991
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
May 11, 2005
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 54.0%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of May 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned matter is GRANTED, as to the following issues:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that petitioner motor carrier is respondent’s employer when it did not exercise the requisite control over respondent’s activities?

*38 Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that joint and several liability can be appropriate under the workers’ compensation liability scheme?

The Application for Supersedeas is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.