Opinion

Brown v. Candelora

  • 555 Pa. 478
  • 725 A.2d 176
  • 1999 Pa. LEXIS 677
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 16, 1999
Status
Published
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 74.6%

conditional, unliquidated claim for breach of contract is not subject to attachment

How later courts described this case

  • conditional, unliquidated claim for breach of contract is not subject to attachment

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred by affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas granting Respondent Nation *479 wide’s petition to set aside Petitioners’ garnishment proceeding based on claims of bad faith even though those claims had not been expressly assigned to Petitioners by the insured and even though Nationwide had already paid the full limits of the insured’s policy. 1

. We note that the grant of allocatur in the instant case is strictly limited to the issue presented in this Order, and that the parties are not to brief or present argument concerning Petitioner’s allegation that the lower courts should have permitted its garnishment action against Respondent Nationwide to proceed based on Nationwide's obligation to pay delay damages and/or judgment interest.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.