Opinion

Bergmeister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

  • 529 Pa. 1
  • 600 A.2d 531
  • 1991 Pa. LEXIS 288
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 1, 1991
Status
Published
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.5%

claimant immediately notified his supervisor that his physician recommended that he stop working because his illness was work-related, and employer agreed with elaim- *539 ant that to remain employed would be injurious to him; employer then began making payments to claimant

How later courts described this case

  • claimant immediately notified his supervisor that his physician recommended that he stop working because his illness was work-related, and employer agreed with elaim- *539 ant that to remain employed would be injurious to him; employer then began making payments to claimant

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Order of the Commonwealth Court dated July 18, 1990, is affirmed and the matter is remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board for consideration and disposition of the issues raised by PMA Insurance Company but *2 not reached because of the Board’s order dated September 18, 1989, at No. A-95630.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.