Opinion

Akins v. York Officers' & Employees' Retirement Board

  • 368 Pa. 182
  • 81 A.2d 883
  • 1951 Pa. LEXIS 461
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 27, 1951
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Bell, Chidsey, Jones, Ladner, Stearne, Stern
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.9%

The opinion

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

The question involved on this appeal is the same as in the case of Altieri v. Allentown Officers’ and Employees’ Retirement Board, p. 176 ante. The result in the lower court in the instant case is opposite to that reached in the Altieri case. In this case the learned court below sustained the defendant board’s contention that Section 4(b) of the Third Class City Employees Retirement Law of May 23,1945, P.L. 903, violates Sections 11 and 18 of Article III of the Pennsylvania Constitution and, accordingly, entered judgment for the board. The plaintiff-employee thereupon brought this appeal. As we pointed out in the Altieri case, supra, the constitutional questions need not be considered in view of the fact that Section 4(b) is deficient and unenforceable. For the reasons set forth in the Altieri case, we approve the judgment entered in the instant case.

Judgment affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.