Opinion

Malloy v. Board of Health

  • 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422
  • 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 922
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 15, 1891
Status
Published
Author
Barnard
On the bench
Barnard, Dticman, Pratt
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.7%

The opinion

Barnard, P. J.:

The plaintiffs performed work under a contract with the defendant. The expense was a town charge. (Laws of 1885, chap. 270.) The Board of Health has no place as a defendant. It is a town agency only. The claim must be presented to the town auditors for audit. (Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y., 324 ; People ex rel. Board of Health, etc., v. Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, 18 Barb., 567 ; Bell v. Town of Esopus, 49 id., 506.)

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Pratt, J., concurred; Dticman, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.