Opinion

Holmes, LaDonna v. Amazon.Com

  • 2022 TN WC 8
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Feb 3, 2022
Status
Published
On the bench
Allen Phillips
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.3%

The opinion

FILED

Feb 03, 2022

03:34 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

LADONNA HOLMES, ) Docket No. 2020-08-0229

Employee, )

v. )

AMAZON.COM, ) State File No. 5700-2020

Employer, )

And )

AMERICAN ZURICH INS. CO., ) Judge Allen Phillips

Carrier. )

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court held a hearing on February 1, 2022, on Amazon’s Motion for Summary

Judgment. For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion.

Facts

Amazon filed a Petition for Benefit Determination alleging that Ms. Holmes failed

to pursue a claim for benefits for a December 8, 2019 injury. The mediating specialist filed

a Dispute Certification Notice on October 29, 2021, and noted in an addendum that Ms.

Holmes did not cooperate in setting mediation.

On November 2, Amazon filed this Motion for Summary Judgment and obtained

the February 1 hearing date from the Court. Amazon provided notice of the hearing to Ms.

Holmes.

In support of its motion, Amazon filed a Statement of Undisputed facts as required

by Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56.03 supported by a managerial employee

affidavit. The Court summarizes those facts as follows:

1. On December 8, 2019, Ms. Holmes instigated an altercation with a co-employee,

which resulted in their termination.

2. Amazon’s Code of Conduct prohibits altercations at work.

1

3. Amazon’s Code of Conduct explained the reasons for the policy against

altercations, specifically to prevent the risk of injury or financial loss.

4. Amazon enforces its policy against altercations.

5. Ms. Holmes received a copy of the Code of Conduct when she was hired.

6. During the altercation, Ms. Holmes lost her balance and fell, leading to her

making a claim for benefits.

Based on these facts, Amazon contended it was entitled to summary judgment under

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-110(a)(1) (2021), which provides no

compensation is allowed for an injury resulting from an employee’s misconduct. Amazon

cited Mitchell v. Fayetteville Pub. Util., 368 S.W.3d 442, 453 (Tenn. 2012), where the

Tennessee Supreme Court adopted the following four-part analysis for willful misconduct

and safety-rule violations:

1. The employee’s actual as opposed to constructive notice of the rule;

2. The employee’s understanding of the danger involved in violating the rule;

3. The employer’s bona fide enforcement of the rule; and

4. The employee’s lack of a valid excuse for violating the rule.

Amazon claimed it satisfied all four factors.

Ms. Holmes did not file a response to the motion and did not appear for the hearing.

Analysis

Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56.02 provides that a party against whom a

claim is asserted may move for summary judgment at any time. Johnson v. Loomis

Armored, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 60, at *9 (Nov. 21, 2018). Further, Rule

56.03 provides specific filing requirements for both parties in summary judgment cases,

and they “are not mere suggestions” but rather plain and unambiguous requirements.

Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15,

2017).

Specifically, as the moving party, Amazon must file a statement of undisputed

material facts with citations to the record. It did so. As the nonmoving party, Ms. Holmes

must respond to Amazon’s statement of undisputed facts, indicating either her agreement

with the facts or demonstrating how they are disputed. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.03. She did not.

Thus, the Court considers Amazon’s motion unopposed and whether summary judgment

is appropriate.

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to

interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there

is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment

2

as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04. To prevail, Amazon must do one of two things:

(1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Ms. Holmes’s claim,

or (2) demonstrate that her evidence is insufficient to establish entitlement to benefits.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC.,

477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015).

Amazon proved that Ms. Holmes was guilty of misconduct, it had a rule against the

misconduct, Ms. Holmes was aware of the rule and the reasons for it, and it enforced the

rule. These facts meet the requirements for a misconduct affirmative defense under

Mitchell, and Ms. Holmes filed nothing to refute them. It follows then that it has submitted

affirmative evidence to negate an essential element of Ms. Holmes’s claim, and Amazon

is entitled to summary judgment.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Court grants Amazon’s Motion for Summary Judgment on grounds that Ms.

Holmes engaged in misconduct under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-

110 (a)(1). Her claim against Amazon is dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.

2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final in thirty days.

3. The Court assesses the $150.00 filing fee against Amazon, for which execution

might issue as necessary. Amazon shall pay the filing fee to the Clerk within five

business days of this order becoming final.

4. Amazon shall file Form SD-2 with the Clerk within five business days of this

order becoming final.

IT IS ORDERED.

ENTERED February 3, 2022.

______________________________________

JUDGE ALLEN PHILLIPS

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on February 3, 2022.

Name Certified First Class Email Service sent to:

Mail Mail

Ladonna Holmes, X X X 210 W. Jackson Ave., Apt. G10

Employee West Memphis, AR 72301

W. Troy Hart and X wth@mijs.com

Kristen C. Stevenson, kcstevenson@mijs.com

Employer’s Attorneys

Penny Shrum, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

4

Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the

date the compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you

must serve a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. A licensed court

reporter must prepare a transcript and file it with the court clerk within fifteen calendar

days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the

evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifteen calendar days of the filing of the

Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate

account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement

of the evidence before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals

Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the

absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to

meaningful appellate review.

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the court clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. The appealing

party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the

Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board.

To appeal your case directly to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Compensation Hearing

Order must be final and you must comply with the Tennessee Rules of Appellate

Procedure. If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s

Order will become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. See Tenn.

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.