Opinion

Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Filed
Jan 26, 2022
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00384-CV

Kirsten Hanna; Upside Up Properties, LLC; and Upside Up Ventures, Inc., Appellants

v.

M. Matthew Williams; David Howell; Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams; and

Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC, Appellees

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-21-000957, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 3, 2021, we granted appellants’ unopposed motion to abate their

appeal so that they could cure a “potential jurisdictional impediment” by having the trial

court sever appellees’ counterclaim from the underlying proceeding. See Hanna v. Williams,

No. 03-21-00384-CV, 2021 WL 5750189, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 3, 2021, no pet.) (per

curiam) (mem. op.). Appellants have now filed both a status report stating that the trial court

denied their motion to sever and an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, we

reinstate the appeal, grant appellants’ motion, and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: January 26, 2022

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.