Opinion

K

  • 8 I. & N. Dec. 626
Court
Board of Immigration Appeals
Filed
Jul 1, 1960
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

MATTER or K—

In SECTION 245 Proceedings

A-11487130

Decided by Regional Commissioner April 1, 1960

Approved by Assistant Commissioner April 15, 1960

Nonquota status, section 6, Act of September 22, 1959—Applicant under section.

245 is eligible although not related to petitioner at time of arrival.

Spouse of alien admitted for permanent residence under Refugee Relief Act of

1953 qualifies for nonquota status under section 6 of Act of September 22,

1959 despite occurrence of marriage after both parties had arrived in the

United States.

APPLICATION : Adjustment of status to permanent residence on basis of eligi-

bility for nonquota status under section 6, Public Law 86-363.

BEFORE THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER

Discussion: This case has been certified to the Regional Commis-

sioner by the District Director, Hartford, who has approved the

application.

The applicant is a twenty-nine year old married female, a native

and citizen of Greece, who last entered the United States on June 12,

1958, as a visitor for pleasure.

On July 6, 1958, she married S G K—, a permanent resi-

dent alien who was admitted on November 5, 1956, under section.

4(a) (3) of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953.

A visa petition filed by the applicant's husband to accord her third.

preference quota status under section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration

and Nationality Act was approved on November 24, 1958.

The applicant applied for adjustment of status on September 30,

1959, to that of a permanent resident under section 245 of the Act,

as amended, claiming that she was eligible for nonquota status under

section 6 of Public Law 86-363.

Section 6 of the Act of September 22, 1959 (Public Law 86-363),

reads as follows:

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 3 and 20 of the Refugee Relief

Act of 1953, as amended, special nonquota immigrant visas may be issued to

aliens eligible to enter the United States for permanent residence under all

the applicable provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act: Provided,

626

That each such alien is found to be the beneficiary of a visa petition ap-

proved by the Attorney General pursuant to section 203(a) (2) and (3) and

section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act prior to January 1, 1959,

and such petition was Sled by a person lawfully admitted into the United

States under the provisions of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953, as amended:

Provided further, That, upon his application for an immigrant visa, and for

his admission into the United States, the alien is found to have retained his

relationship to the petitioner, and status, as established In the approved

petition.

All the prerequisites for nonquota status described in section 6 of

the Act of September 22, 1959, supra, are present in this case. The

applicant's husband was lawfully admitted for permanent residence

wider the provisions of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953. A visa

petition in her behalf filed by her husband was approved under

section 203(a) (3) prior to January 1, 1959, and at the time of her

application for adjustment of status she was found to have retained

her relationship to the petitioner, and status, as established in the

appro-ved petiti on.

The sole question before us is whether section 6 of the Act of

September 22, 1959, was intended to benefit persons who were not

related to the petitioner at the time he was admitted to the United

States for permanent residence under the Refugee Relief Act of 1953.

In this case the petitioner was single when he arrived in this coun-

try and did not marry the applicant until after he had been in the

United States for over a year.

The wording of the statute is clear and unambiguous. In this in-

stance if the applicant were outside the United States, she would

clearly come within the s c ope of section 6 of the Act of September

22, 1959. We are satisfied that she was a bona fide nonimmigrant

at the time of her last entry. We are satisfied there is nothing in

the provision of section 6 of the Act of September 22, 1959, which

would preclude the exercise of the benefits of the same section

through proceedings under the provisions of section 245 of the

Immigration and Nationality Act. Accordingly, it is held that the

applicant is eligible for a special nonquota immigrant visa.

Order: It is ordered that the application for status as a permanent

resident be granted.

627

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.