Opinion

Delgado v. New York City Board of Education

  • 272 A.D.2d 207
  • 708 N.Y.S.2d 292
  • 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5633
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
May 18, 2000
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 59.2%

The opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered February 1, 2000, which, in a proceeding to vacate or modify an arbitration decision rejecting petitioner’s grievance of the termination of his employment with the Office of School Food and Nutritional Services of respondent Board of Education, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner lacks standing to bring the instant petition since he was represented by the union at the arbitration (see, Sampson v Board of Educ., 191 AD2d 283 ), and we affirm the dismissal of the petition for that reason. Although the issue of standing is first raised on appeal, it poses a question of law that could not have been avoided had it been raised before the IAS Court, and therefore may be entertained at this juncture (see, Chateau D’If Corp. v City of New York, 219 AD2d 205, 209 , lv denied 88 NY2d 811 ). In any event, as the IAS Court held, the petition does not sufficiently allege any of the grounds under CPLR 7511 (b) for vacating an arbitration award. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.