Opinion

Jones v. New York City Board of Education

  • 189 A.D.2d 818
  • 592 N.Y.S.2d 441
  • 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 288
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Jan 19, 1993
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 62.7%

The opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the appellant New York City Board of Education dated July 21, 1989, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of various acts of misconduct and recommending that he be dismissed from his position as a tenured teacher, the appeal, by permission, is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated July 11, 1990, which annulled the determination insofar as it imposed the penalty of dismissal and remitted the matter for the imposition of a lesser penalty.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the determination of the appellant New York City Board of Education is reinstated in its entirety.

The petitioner did not seek review of the issue of whether there was substantial evidence to support the findings of guilt as to the charges lodged against him, and alleged only that the penalty of dismissal was improper. The Supreme Court agreed and remitted the matter to the appellant New York City Board of Education for the imposition of a lesser penalty. We find that this penalty, while obviously severe, is not, under all the circumstances, so disproportionate to the offenses in question as to shock one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233). Significantly, the hearing panel found that the petitioner had failed to improve his performance despite many warnings and opportunities to do so and that he would not improve his skills if permitted to return to work (see, Mongitore v Regan, 133 AD2d 815 ; Matter of Carlan v Board of Educ., 128 AD2d 706 ). Balletta, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.