Opinion

Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services v. Brown

  • 176 A.D.2d 1205
  • 576 N.Y.S.2d 703
  • 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13869
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Oct 4, 1991
Status
Published
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 59.5%

The opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law and the facts without costs, petition granted and matter remitted to Cattaraugus County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court erred in dismissing the petition in this paternity proceeding without making findings of fact (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of County of Erie v Michel, 93 AD2d 997 ; see also, Augustine v Tandle, 47 AD2d 710 ). Nonetheless, there is a sufficient record before us to allow us to make the necessary findings (see, Matter of Commissioner of *1206 Social Servs. of County of Erie v Michel, supra; see also, Matter of Espin v Pierce, 85 AD2d 503 ). On March 27, 1989, Bowen gave birth to a son after a full-term pregnancy. Thus, the period of conception was late June or early July 1988. Bowen testified that she had sexual intercourse with respondent on several occasions in June and July 1988. Respondent was present at the hearing before the Judicial Hearing Officer but failed to testify. We may infer, therefore, that he and Bowen did engage in sexual intercourse during the period of conception (see, Matter of Jane PP. v Paul QQ., 65 NY2d 994 , 996; see also, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip De G., 59 NY2d 137, 141 ). Although Bowen admitted to having had sexual intercourse with two other men during the possible period of conception, HLA tests excluded the possibility that either was the child’s father. Moreover, an HLA test result established a 97.5% probability that respondent was the child’s father. We find, therefore, that respondent’s paternity is established by clear and convincing evidence (see, Matter of Commissioner of Saratoga County Dept, of Social Servs. v David Z., 133 AD2d 882 ; Matter of Constance G. v Herbert Lewis L., 119 AD2d 209 ; Matter of Julie UU. v Joseph W., 108 AD2d 1038 ; see also, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of County of Erie v Michel, supra; cf., Matter of Jane PP. v Paul QQ., supra), and we remit the matter to Cattaraugus County Family Court for a hearing on the issue of support. (Appeal from Order of Cattaraugus County Family Court, Trost, J.H.O. — Paternity.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.